A globally diversified low cost portfolio focused on long term growth with moderate downside risk
Risk profile
- Secure Speculative
The risk profile, derived from past market volatility, reflects the level of risk the portfolio is exposed to. This assessment helps align your investments with your financial goals and comfort with market fluctuations.
Diversification profile
- Focused Diversified
The diversification assessment evaluates the spread of investments across asset classes, regions, and sectors. This ensures a balanced mix, reducing risk and maximizing returns by not concentrating in any single area.
What type of investor this portfolio is suitable for
Balanced Investors
This setup fits someone comfortable with meaningful market ups and downs in pursuit of strong long-term growth. It suits an investor with a multi-decade horizon, like saving for retirement or long-range wealth building, who can tolerate drawdowns around 30% without abandoning the plan. The person is likely more focused on maximizing growth than on steady income and accepts that international exposure will sometimes lag domestic markets. A moderate to moderately high risk tolerance, combined with a disciplined mindset that can ignore short-term noise, would be important. It’s best aligned with someone who values simplicity, low costs, and broad diversification over tactical trading or frequent tinkering.
Positions
-
FIDELITY ZERO INTERNATIONAL INDEX FUND
FZILX - US31635T6091 45.00% -
FIDELITY ZERO TOTAL MARKET INDEX FUND
FZROX - US31635T7081 45.00% -
FIDELITY U.S. BOND INDEX FUND INSTITUTIONAL PREMIUM CLASS
FXNAX - US3161463563 10.00%
The structure here is pleasantly simple: roughly 45% in a broad US stock fund, 45% in broad international stocks, and 10% in US bonds. That’s very close to a textbook “balanced growth” setup, with a tilt toward stocks compared with many classic 60/40 mixes. Being this close to broad market weights matters because it reduces the chance of big bets on any single niche. It also aligns nicely with common benchmarks, which is a good sign. If the ride feels too bumpy over time, nudging the bond slice up a bit and trimming stocks slightly could smooth volatility without overcomplicating things.
Growth
Historically, this mix has delivered a strong compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 11.68%. CAGR is basically the “average speed” of your portfolio per year, smoothing out all the ups and downs. That’s an impressive figure and suggests the allocation has ridden global equity strength well. The tradeoff is a max drawdown of about –31%, meaning that at one point the portfolio would have been down almost a third from a peak. That kind of hit is normal for a stock‑heavy balanced mix but can be emotionally tough. If that size of drop would cause panic selling, gradually increasing the bond portion over time could help.
Projection
The Monte Carlo results give a forward-looking reality check using historical behavior. A Monte Carlo simulation basically runs thousands of “what if” paths, shuffling returns in different orders to see many possible futures. Across 1,000 runs, the median outcome (50th percentile) of around 215% suggests more than doubling capital over the long term, while even the 5th percentile at 14.5% shows that most bad cases still had some growth. The average simulated annualized return of 9.61% is solid. Still, all of this is based on past patterns, which may not repeat. Treat these numbers as rough weather forecasts, not guarantees, and avoid planning around the rosiest scenarios.
Asset classes
- Stocks 90%
- Bonds 10%
- Cash 0%
- Other 0%
- Not Classified 0%
The portfolio sits at about 90% stocks and 10% bonds, with no meaningful cash or “other” assets. That’s aggressive for something labeled balanced, but very reasonable for someone with a long horizon and decent risk tolerance. Equities drive growth; bonds act as a shock absorber. With only 10% in bonds, the cushion in major downturns is limited, yet the growth potential is high. Compared with many balanced benchmarks that hold more bonds, this mix leans more toward growth. If preserving capital during big market crashes is a top concern, shifting slowly toward a higher bond share over time could better match a traditional balanced profile.
Sectors
- Technology 22%
- Financials 17%
- Industrials 11%
- Consumer Discretionary 9%
- Health Care 8%
- Telecommunications 7%
- Consumer Staples 5%
- Basic Materials 4%
- Energy 3%
- Utilities 2%
- Real Estate 2%
Sector exposure looks very well aligned with broad global equity benchmarks. Technology around 22%, financials 17%, and meaningful slices in industrials, consumer, and healthcare indicate healthy diversification. This is helpful because no single industry is dominating the risk budget. Tech and growth-oriented areas can still be volatile, especially when interest rates are moving or economic expectations change, but the presence of defensive sectors like consumer staples, utilities, and healthcare gives some balance. This composition matches benchmark data closely, which is a strong indicator of diversification. There’s no glaring concentration issue, so the main lever to adjust risk is overall stock/bond mix rather than tinkering with sectors.
Regions
- North America 49%
- Europe Developed 18%
- Unknown 10%
- Japan 7%
- Asia Developed 6%
- Asia Emerging 5%
- Australasia 2%
- Africa/Middle East 2%
- Latin America 1%
- Europe Emerging 0%
Geographically, the exposure is nicely spread: roughly half in North America, with solid allocations to developed Europe, Japan, and other developed and emerging regions. This global stance helps avoid overreliance on any single country’s economy or policies. Many US investors are heavily tilted toward the US, so having about 51% abroad (counting developed, emerging, and “unknown”) is more globally balanced than usual. That’s great for diversification, but it does mean performance can differ from US-centric benchmarks, especially in stretches when US markets strongly outperform or underperform. If home-country comfort is important, gradually shifting a few percentage points from international toward domestic stocks could make the ride feel more intuitive.
Market capitalization
- Mega-cap 42%
- Large-cap 29%
- Mid-cap 14%
- Small-cap 3%
- Micro-cap 1%
The portfolio is dominated by large companies, with about 42% in mega caps and 29% in big caps. Mid caps and small caps round out the rest with modest exposure. This pattern is typical of broad market index funds and is generally a strength: mega and large caps tend to be more stable, widely followed, and less prone to extreme swings than tiny firms. Smaller positions in mid and small caps still add some extra growth potential and diversification. This allocation is well-balanced and aligns closely with global standards. Anyone wanting a bit more “spice” could slightly increase small and mid-cap exposure, but it’s not necessary for a solid core strategy.
Dividends
- FIDELITY U.S. BOND INDEX FUND INSTITUTIONAL PREMIUM CLASS 3.30%
- FIDELITY ZERO INTERNATIONAL INDEX FUND 2.40%
- FIDELITY ZERO TOTAL MARKET INDEX FUND 1.00%
- Weighted yield (per year) 1.86%
Yield across the portfolio is moderate, around 1.86% overall, driven mainly by the 3.30% from bonds and 2.40% from international stocks. Yield is the cash income paid out, like interest and dividends, as a percentage of the portfolio. For a growth-focused mix, this level is sensible: enough to contribute meaningfully to total return without sacrificing too much growth potential. Income-oriented investors usually seek higher yields, but that often comes with sector or style concentration. Here, income is a nice bonus rather than the main goal. Reinvesting those payouts can quietly accelerate compounding. If stable income is ever a future priority, slowly tilting toward higher-yielding holdings or more bonds could help.
Ongoing product costs
- FIDELITY U.S. BOND INDEX FUND INSTITUTIONAL PREMIUM CLASS 0.02%
Costs are impressively low, especially with the bond index fund at just 0.02% and the “ZERO” funds charging no expense ratio. Fees work like friction on a car: the more friction, the more speed you lose over a long trip. Keeping fees this close to zero is a major advantage that compounds every year. Over decades, even a 0.5% difference in costs can add up to tens of thousands of dollars on a sizable portfolio. This cost profile is a genuine strength and supports better long-term performance. There is very little to improve here; the main focus can remain on allocation and discipline rather than hunting for lower expenses.
Risk vs. return
This chart shows the Efficient Frontier, calculated using your current assets with different allocation combinations. It highlights the best balance between risk and return based on historical data. "Efficient" portfolios maximize returns for a given risk or minimize risk for a given return. Portfolios below the curve are less efficient. This is informational and not a recommendation to buy or sell any assets.
On a risk–return basis, this portfolio likely sits close to the Efficient Frontier for these specific building blocks. The Efficient Frontier is the set of mixes that give the best possible return for a given level of volatility, using only the current ingredients. With 90% in equities, the mix emphasizes growth at the cost of sharper swings. A slightly higher bond allocation could move the portfolio closer to a more “efficient” point for a moderate-risk investor by trimming volatility more than it trims expected return. Efficiency, though, is just about the risk–return tradeoff; personal goals, taxes, and behavior still matter just as much when deciding on the ideal mix.
What next?
Ready to invest in this portfolio?
Select a broker that fits your needs and watch for low fees to maximize your returns.
Create your own report?
Join our community!
The information provided on this platform is for informational purposes only and should not be considered as financial or investment advice. Insightfolio does not provide investment advice, personalized recommendations, or guidance regarding the purchase, holding, or sale of financial assets. The tools and content are intended for educational purposes only and are not tailored to individual circumstances, financial needs, or objectives.
Insightfolio assumes no liability for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Users are solely responsible for verifying the information and making independent decisions based on their own research and careful consideration. Use of the platform should not replace consultation with qualified financial professionals.
Investments involve risks. Users should be aware that the value of investments may fluctuate and that past performance is not an indicator of future results. Investment decisions should be based on personal financial goals, risk tolerance, and independent evaluation of relevant information.
Insightfolio does not endorse or guarantee the suitability of any particular financial product, security, or strategy. Any projections, forecasts, or hypothetical scenarios presented on the platform are for illustrative purposes only and are not guarantees of future outcomes.
By accessing the services, information, or content offered by Insightfolio, users acknowledge and agree to these terms of the disclaimer. If you do not agree to these terms, please do not use our platform.
