Globally diversified equity portfolio with strong factor tilts and efficient risk return positioning
Report created on Mar 26, 2026Risk profile
- Secure Speculative
The risk profile, derived from past market volatility, reflects the level of risk the portfolio is exposed to. This assessment helps align your investments with your financial goals and comfort with market fluctuations.
Diversification profile
- Focused Diversified
The diversification assessment evaluates the spread of investments across asset classes, regions, and sectors. This ensures a balanced mix, reducing risk and maximizing returns by not concentrating in any single area.
What type of investor this portfolio is suitable for
Balanced Investors
This setup fits an investor who is comfortable with equity‑only investing, aiming for long‑term growth over at least a 10‑year horizon. They can tolerate sizeable temporary losses of 30% or more without panicking, as they see volatility as the price of higher potential returns. Goals might include building wealth for retirement, financial independence, or long‑range life plans rather than short‑term spending. They appreciate simplicity, broad global diversification, and evidence‑based tilts like value and small caps, rather than frequent trading or picking individual stocks. Regular saving into this kind of structure, plus the discipline to sit tight through market swings, would align well with their temperament and objectives.
Positions
-
Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation
VWCE - IE00BK5BQT80 80.00% -
iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
IWVL - IE00BP3QZB59 10.00% -
iShares MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
WSML - IE00BF4RFH31 10.00%
The structure is very simple and very focused: three equity ETFs, all in accumulation form, with 80% in a broad global fund and 10% each in a value fund and a small‑cap fund. That means everything is in stocks and all income gets automatically reinvested. This kind of simplicity is powerful because it’s easy to understand, easy to maintain, and avoids unnecessary overlap between dozens of products. The main implication is that outcomes will closely track global stock markets, with a deliberate tilt toward cheaper and smaller companies. For someone who wants long‑term growth and can accept meaningful ups and downs, this is a clean, coherent setup.
Growth
Historically, €1,000 grew to about €2,005 from mid‑2019 to early‑2026, a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 11.87%. CAGR is the “average yearly speed” over the whole journey. That slightly lagged the US market but modestly beat the global market, with very similar maximum drawdowns around –34%. Max drawdown is the worst peak‑to‑trough fall over the period, giving a sense of how painful bad times can feel. The small gap versus the US reflects your broader diversification outside one country, which has been a headwind recently but is healthier long term. As always, past performance is not a promise of future results, especially over a relatively short seven‑year window.
Projection
The Monte Carlo simulation projects many possible 10‑year paths using the portfolio’s historical return and volatility as a guide. Think of it as “re‑rolling” the last few years thousands of times in different orders to see a range of outcomes. The median scenario shows roughly a 3.6x increase after 10 years, while even the pessimistic 5th percentile still shows a positive 43.7% gain. That’s encouraging but not guaranteed, because future markets can differ from the past. The key message is that outcomes are wide: there’s real upside potential but also the risk of long stretches of disappointment. Staying invested through those swings is crucial for actually capturing the long‑term growth suggested by the simulation.
Asset classes
- Stocks 100%
All assets here are stocks, with 100% in equities and nothing in bonds, cash, or alternatives. That creates strong growth potential but also exposes the portfolio fully to equity market swings, including deep temporary losses. Many broad benchmarks used for mixed‑risk investors include at least some bonds to dampen volatility, so this is more aggressive than a classic “balanced” multi‑asset mix even though it’s classified as balanced in your system. The high diversification score shows that risk is spread across many companies and regions, but it’s still all equity risk. If smoother ride and capital preservation are priorities, adding some defensive assets could be worth thinking about over time.
Sectors
- Technology 25%
- Financials 16%
- Industrials 12%
- Consumer Discretionary 10%
- Health Care 9%
- Telecommunications 8%
- Consumer Staples 5%
- Basic Materials 4%
- Energy 4%
- Utilities 3%
- Real Estate 3%
Sector exposure is well spread: technology around a quarter, followed by financials, industrials, consumer cyclicals, healthcare, and others, with no single sector dominating excessively. This looks close to global equity benchmarks, where tech is usually the largest slice but not the entire story. Tech‑heavy allocations can be more sensitive to interest rate moves and sentiment around growth stocks, while financials and industrials often move differently across the economic cycle. This mix is a strong indicator of diversification, limiting the damage if one sector hits a rough patch. It also means performance will broadly reflect how the global economy evolves, rather than hinging on a single industry’s fortunes.
Regions
- North America 61%
- Europe Developed 17%
- Japan 8%
- Asia Developed 5%
- Asia Emerging 4%
- Australasia 2%
- Africa/Middle East 1%
- Latin America 1%
Regionally, about 61% is in North America, with meaningful exposure to developed Europe, Japan, other developed Asia, emerging Asia, and smaller allocations to other regions. That North American tilt is very much in line with global stock market weights, where the US is dominant. The benefits are access to many of the world’s largest and most profitable companies, plus strong sector diversification. The trade‑off is that returns are still heavily influenced by US market cycles and the US dollar environment. The presence of non‑US regions adds valuable diversification and helps reduce dependence on any single economy, which is a healthy alignment with global investing standards.
Market capitalization
- Mega-cap 42%
- Large-cap 33%
- Mid-cap 18%
- Small-cap 5%
- Micro-cap 1%
The market cap breakdown is tilted toward large companies, with roughly 42% in mega caps, 33% in big caps, and the rest in mid, small, and a sliver of micro caps. This resembles global benchmarks but with an extra boost to smaller stocks thanks to the dedicated small‑cap ETF. Large and mega caps tend to be more stable, widely researched, and less volatile, while small caps can be more sensitive to economic conditions but sometimes offer higher long‑term return potential. This blend gives a nice balance between stability and growth optionality. The explicit small‑cap sleeve adds diversification away from the mega‑cap giants without dominating overall risk.
True holdings
-
NVIDIA Corporation 3.37%Part of fund(s):
- Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation
-
Apple Inc 3.13%Part of fund(s):
- Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation
-
Microsoft Corporation 2.37%Part of fund(s):
- Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation
-
Amazon.com Inc 1.64%Part of fund(s):
- Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation
-
Alphabet Inc Class A 1.48%Part of fund(s):
- Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation
-
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. Ltd. 1.26%Part of fund(s):
- Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation
-
Broadcom Inc 1.20%Part of fund(s):
- Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation
-
Alphabet Inc Class C 1.20%Part of fund(s):
- Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation
-
Meta Platforms Inc. 1.15%Part of fund(s):
- Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation
-
Tesla Inc 0.92%Part of fund(s):
- LS 1x Tesla Tracker ETP Securities GBP
- Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation
- Top 10 total 17.73%
Looking through the ETFs, the largest indirect exposures are familiar mega‑cap names like NVIDIA, Apple, Microsoft, Amazon, Alphabet, and Meta, each in the low single digits. That’s normal for global equity funds, as these companies dominate global market indices. Because only the top 10 holdings per ETF are visible, total overlap is understated, but it’s clear that no single company drives a huge share of risk by itself. The takeaway is that there is some hidden concentration in big global leaders, yet it remains well spread across several names. This aligns with typical broad‑market investing and keeps single‑company risk in check while still capturing their growth.
Factors
Factor exposure is where this portfolio really stands out. It shows strong tilts toward value, yield, and momentum, with moderate size and low‑volatility signals. Factors are like underlying “styles” — cheap vs. expensive, strong recent performers vs. laggards, stable vs. volatile. A value tilt means more exposure to companies trading at lower valuations; yield leans toward higher dividend payers; momentum focuses on recent winners. Historically these factors have been rewarded over long periods but can underperform for years at a time. The combination of value and small‑cap exposure can help diversify away from pure growth mega caps, while momentum may boost returns in trending markets but hurt during sharp reversals. Signal coverage is only partial, so factor readings aren’t perfect, but the intentional tilts are clear and thoughtfully designed.
Risk contribution
-
Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation
Weight: 80.00% 78.9% -
iShares MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
Weight: 10.00% 11.2% -
iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
Weight: 10.00% 9.9%
Risk contribution shows how much each holding adds to overall portfolio ups and downs, which can differ from its weight. Here, the broad All‑World ETF is 80% of the weight and contributes about 79% of the risk, almost one‑for‑one. The small‑cap ETF is only 10% by weight but contributes slightly more than 11% of risk, reflecting that smaller companies are a bit more volatile. The value ETF’s risk share roughly matches its weight. This is a very clean risk profile with no hidden “risk bombs.” If at some point you wanted to dial down volatility, trimming the small‑cap slice or overall equity weight would be more impactful than tweaking the value tilt.
Risk vs. return
This chart shows the Efficient Frontier, calculated using your current assets with different allocation combinations. It highlights the best balance between risk and return based on historical data. "Efficient" portfolios maximize returns for a given risk or minimize risk for a given return. Portfolios below the curve are less efficient. This is informational and not a recommendation to buy or sell any assets.
On the risk‑return chart, the current portfolio sits on the efficient frontier, which means that, given these three holdings, there isn’t a better return for the same risk using different weights along the entire curve. The Sharpe ratio of 0.61 is solid, though a reweighted “optimal” mix could push it up to about 0.69 with similar or slightly lower risk. There’s also a same‑risk optimized version that would accept a bit more volatility for higher expected return. Since the current mix is already efficient, any changes would be about fine‑tuning style tilts (for example, how much small‑cap or value) rather than fixing a flaw. This is a strong confirmation that the overall design is working well.
Ongoing product costs
- Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation 0.19%
- iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) 0.30%
- iShares MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF USD (Acc) 0.35%
- Weighted costs total (per year) 0.22%
Costs are impressively low, with a total TER around 0.22%. TER (total expense ratio) is the yearly percentage taken by the funds to cover management and operating costs. Keeping this low is one of the few things investors can reliably control, and the difference compounds hugely over decades. These levels are well in line with or better than many broad, factor, and small‑cap index products in Europe. Low fees support better long‑term performance by letting more of the market’s return stay in your pocket. From a cost perspective, this setup is already very efficient, and there’s no obvious pressure to change anything purely on fees.
What next?
Create your own report?
Join our community!
The information provided on this platform is for informational purposes only and should not be considered as financial or investment advice. Insightfolio does not provide investment advice, personalized recommendations, or guidance regarding the purchase, holding, or sale of financial assets. The tools and content are intended for educational purposes only and are not tailored to individual circumstances, financial needs, or objectives.
Insightfolio assumes no liability for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Users are solely responsible for verifying the information and making independent decisions based on their own research and careful consideration. Use of the platform should not replace consultation with qualified financial professionals.
Investments involve risks. Users should be aware that the value of investments may fluctuate and that past performance is not an indicator of future results. Investment decisions should be based on personal financial goals, risk tolerance, and independent evaluation of relevant information.
Insightfolio does not endorse or guarantee the suitability of any particular financial product, security, or strategy. Any projections, forecasts, or hypothetical scenarios presented on the platform are for illustrative purposes only and are not guarantees of future outcomes.
By accessing the services, information, or content offered by Insightfolio, users acknowledge and agree to these terms of the disclaimer. If you do not agree to these terms, please do not use our platform.
Help us improve Insightfolio
Your feedback makes a difference! Share your thoughts in our quick survey. Take the survey