Globally diversified stock portfolio with strong large cap tilt and efficient low cost structure
Report created on Mar 21, 2026Risk profile
- Secure Speculative
The risk profile, derived from past market volatility, reflects the level of risk the portfolio is exposed to. This assessment helps align your investments with your financial goals and comfort with market fluctuations.
Diversification profile
- Focused Diversified
The diversification assessment evaluates the spread of investments across asset classes, regions, and sectors. This ensures a balanced mix, reducing risk and maximizing returns by not concentrating in any single area.
What type of investor this portfolio is suitable for
Balanced Investors
This kind of setup generally suits an investor with a moderate‑to‑high risk tolerance who is comfortable riding out stock market swings. Typical goals might include long‑term wealth growth, retirement saving, or building capital for major future expenses rather than seeking regular income. The time horizon is ideally at least 10–15 years, allowing enough runway for equities to recover from downturns. Someone fitting this profile usually accepts that portfolio values can fall 20% or more in rough markets, but prioritises long‑run growth over short‑term stability. They also tend to appreciate simple, low‑cost, rules‑based strategies and are willing to rebalance occasionally rather than trade frequently.
Positions
-
SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Acc
SPYL - IE000XZSV718 80.00% -
Xtrackers MSCI World ex USA UCITS ETF 1C USD
EXUS - IE0006WW1TQ4 15.00% -
iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS
EIMI - IE00BKM4GZ66 5.00%
The structure is very straightforward: about 80% in a broad US large cap ETF, 15% in a developed‑world ex‑US ETF, and 5% in emerging markets. That means it is 100% in stocks, with no bonds or alternatives. This simplicity is powerful because it’s easy to understand what drives returns: global equities, primarily from the US. For many long‑term investors, a simple “core plus satellites” layout like this is easier to stick with than a complex mix. The main takeaway is that this is an equity‑only, growth‑oriented setup, so it relies entirely on stock market behaviour for both upside and downside.
Growth
One or more local-currency benchmark funds are unavailable for this report.
Over the recent period, a hypothetical £1,000 grew to about £1,313, which is a 14.27% compound annual growth rate (CAGR). CAGR is like your average yearly “cruising speed” over the full journey. That has beaten the US market reference (11.53% CAGR, ending around £1,251) while also having a smaller max drawdown (‑17.19% versus ‑20.88%). Max drawdown shows the worst peak‑to‑trough fall, which matters for how painful downturns feel. Outperformance with slightly lower worst‑case drop is a good alignment. Just remember this window is short; markets can behave very differently in other periods, so this shouldn’t be assumed as a permanent edge.
Projection
The Monte Carlo simulation takes the portfolio’s historical return and volatility profile and creates 1,000 alternate “what if” futures over 10 years. Think of it as re‑shuffling the past to see a range of possible outcomes. The median result (50th percentile) suggests around 714% cumulative return, while even the pessimistic 5th percentile is still over 200%. The model also shows positive outcomes in all simulations, with an average annualized return of about 16.84%. This is mathematically impressive but should be treated cautiously: the inputs come from a very strong recent environment, and markets rarely stay that friendly. It’s a useful scenario tool, not a promise.
Asset classes
- Stocks 100%
Asset‑class allocation is extremely clear: 100% in stocks, 0% in bonds, cash, or alternatives. Compared with many “balanced” or multi‑asset benchmarks, which often hold 30–60% bonds, this is much more growth‑tilted. Pure equity allocations usually deliver higher expected returns over decades but can be uncomfortable during bear markets or prolonged flat periods. The upside is that diversification within global equities is solid, but there’s little protection if stocks broadly fall together. For someone who wants smoother rides or has shorter‑term cash needs, adding even a modest bond or cash sleeve can help reduce volatility and give dry powder to rebalance after big drops.
Sectors
- Technology 29%
- Financials 15%
- Industrials 10%
- Consumer Discretionary 10%
- Telecommunications 10%
- Health Care 10%
- Consumer Staples 6%
- Energy 4%
- Basic Materials 3%
- Utilities 3%
- Real Estate 2%
Bond positions are excluded from this sector breakdown.
Sector exposure is nicely spread, but with a clear overweight to Technology at 29%. Financial Services, Industrials, Consumer Cyclicals, Communication Services, and Healthcare are all around 10–15%, with Consumer Defensive, Energy, Materials, Utilities, and Real Estate making up smaller slices. Compared with broad global equity benchmarks, this leans a bit more toward tech and growth‑related areas, which have powered returns in recent years. Tech‑heavy allocations can shine when innovation and low rates dominate, but they may wobble more when interest rates rise or sentiment turns against growth names. The balance across ten sectors, though, is a strong diversification base and aligns well with global norms overall.
Regions
- North America 82%
- Europe Developed 9%
- Japan 3%
- Asia Developed 3%
- Asia Emerging 2%
- Australasia 1%
- Africa/Middle East 1%
Bond positions are excluded from this geography breakdown.
Geographically, the portfolio is heavily tilted toward North America at 82%, with Europe Developed about 9%, Japan and other developed Asia around 6%, and emerging regions only a small share. Relative to global benchmarks, which often have the US closer to 60%, this is a clear US overweight. That has been rewarded over the last decade, as US large caps outperformed many other regions. The trade‑off is higher vulnerability if US markets or the dollar underperform for a long stretch. The existing exposure outside North America is still meaningful, but anyone wanting more balance could consider gradually lifting non‑US and emerging allocations to spread country and currency risk.
Market capitalization
- Mega-cap 48%
- Large-cap 35%
- Mid-cap 16%
- Small-cap 1%
Bond positions are excluded from this market cap breakdown.
By market cap, the portfolio is dominated by mega caps (48%) and big caps (35%), with only modest exposure to medium (16%) and very little to small caps (1%). This means most of the action comes from large, established companies with deep liquidity and strong analyst coverage. Large caps typically bring more stability and lower company‑specific blow‑up risk than small, speculative names. However, over very long horizons, smaller companies have sometimes delivered higher returns, albeit with more volatility and bigger drawdowns. The current tilt fits a more conservative equity style: still fully invested in stocks, but with risk concentrated in big, well‑known firms rather than in smaller, more erratic businesses.
True holdings
-
NVIDIA Corporation 5.82%Part of fund(s):
- SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Acc
-
Apple Inc 5.28%Part of fund(s):
- SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Acc
-
Microsoft Corporation 3.95%Part of fund(s):
- SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Acc
-
Amazon.com Inc 2.76%Part of fund(s):
- SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Acc
-
Alphabet Inc Class A 2.45%Part of fund(s):
- SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Acc
-
Broadcom Inc 2.04%Part of fund(s):
- SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Acc
-
Alphabet Inc Class C 1.96%Part of fund(s):
- SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Acc
-
Meta Platforms Inc. 1.91%Part of fund(s):
- SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Acc
-
Tesla Inc 1.53%Part of fund(s):
- LS 1x Tesla Tracker ETP Securities GBP
- SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Acc
-
Berkshire Hathaway Inc 1.25%Part of fund(s):
- SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Acc
- Top 10 total 28.95%
Looking through the ETFs, coverage of underlying holdings is about 57.5%, so the full picture is broader than what we see. Within that view, the largest exposures are mega US names like NVIDIA, Apple, Microsoft, Amazon, Alphabet, Meta, Tesla, Broadcom, and Berkshire. Many of these appear in multiple ETFs, which creates hidden concentration in the “Magnificent Seven” style tech‑enabled giants. Overlap is probably understated because only ETF top‑10s are counted. The main implication is that, although the portfolio uses diversified funds, a lot of risk and return will still be driven by a tight group of big US growth companies, especially in strong or weak tech cycles.
Factors
Factor exposure shows strong tilts to Low Volatility (70), Momentum (37), and Size (20), based on partial signal coverage. Factors are like the underlying “personality traits” of investments that research links to long‑term returns. A Low Volatility tilt suggests a preference for steadier names that historically swing less than the broad market, which can help soften drawdowns. Momentum tilt means the portfolio leans toward stocks that have been recent winners, which can boost returns in trending markets but hurt in sharp reversals. The Size exposure indicates a mild lean away from the very largest names toward somewhat smaller ones. With average signal coverage only about a third, these readings are directionally useful but not ultra‑precise.
Risk contribution
-
SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Acc
Weight: 80.00% 82.6% -
Xtrackers MSCI World ex USA UCITS ETF 1C USD
Weight: 15.00% 13.0% -
iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS
Weight: 5.00% 4.5%
Risk contribution tells you how much each holding adds to overall portfolio ups and downs, which can differ from its weight. Here, the SPDR S&P 500 ETF is 80% of the portfolio but contributes about 82.55% of total risk, so its risk‑to‑weight ratio (1.03) is slightly above one. The other two ETFs contribute a bit less risk than their weights, which is a healthy sign. All risk comes from just three holdings, but that’s expected in a concentrated ETF lineup. The key point is that portfolio behaviour is dominated by the US ETF; any change to that position size or type would meaningfully alter overall volatility and return patterns.
Risk vs. return
This chart shows the Efficient Frontier, calculated using your current assets with different allocation combinations. It highlights the best balance between risk and return based on historical data. "Efficient" portfolios maximize returns for a given risk or minimize risk for a given return. Portfolios below the curve are less efficient. This is informational and not a recommendation to buy or sell any assets.
On the risk‑return chart, the current portfolio has expected return of 14.39% with 14.03% risk, giving a Sharpe ratio of 0.88. The Sharpe ratio measures return per unit of risk; higher is better. Because the current point sits below the efficient frontier, it’s not the best possible mix of these same three ETFs. The optimal combination on the frontier hits a Sharpe of 1.08, and even the minimum‑variance mix has a higher Sharpe (0.99). A same‑risk optimized version could lift expected return to about 18.56% at slightly higher volatility. That means simply reweighting the existing holdings—without adding new ones—could improve risk‑adjusted outcomes while keeping the overall strategy intact.
Ongoing product costs
- iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS 0.18%
- Weighted costs total (per year) 0.01%
Costs look impressively low. The only disclosed TER is 0.18% for the emerging markets ETF, and the blended Total TER at portfolio level is just 0.01%, which suggests the heaviest‑weighted funds are ultra‑cheap. TER (Total Expense Ratio) is the annual percentage fee charged by the fund, quietly deducted inside the ETF. Lower costs leave more of the market’s return in your hands and compound meaningfully over decades. This cost profile aligns strongly with index‑investing best practices and is a real strength of the setup. Keeping this low‑fee mindset when making any future changes will help maintain a solid foundation for long‑term performance.
What next?
Create your own report?
Join our community!
The information provided on this platform is for informational purposes only and should not be considered as financial or investment advice. Insightfolio does not provide investment advice, personalized recommendations, or guidance regarding the purchase, holding, or sale of financial assets. The tools and content are intended for educational purposes only and are not tailored to individual circumstances, financial needs, or objectives.
Insightfolio assumes no liability for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Users are solely responsible for verifying the information and making independent decisions based on their own research and careful consideration. Use of the platform should not replace consultation with qualified financial professionals.
Investments involve risks. Users should be aware that the value of investments may fluctuate and that past performance is not an indicator of future results. Investment decisions should be based on personal financial goals, risk tolerance, and independent evaluation of relevant information.
Insightfolio does not endorse or guarantee the suitability of any particular financial product, security, or strategy. Any projections, forecasts, or hypothetical scenarios presented on the platform are for illustrative purposes only and are not guarantees of future outcomes.
By accessing the services, information, or content offered by Insightfolio, users acknowledge and agree to these terms of the disclaimer. If you do not agree to these terms, please do not use our platform.
