High momentum global stock portfolio with speculative tilt and concentrated single stock risk
Report created on Mar 27, 2026Risk profile
- Secure Speculative
The risk profile, derived from past market volatility, reflects the level of risk the portfolio is exposed to. This assessment helps align your investments with your financial goals and comfort with market fluctuations.
Diversification profile
- Focused Diversified
The diversification assessment evaluates the spread of investments across asset classes, regions, and sectors. This ensures a balanced mix, reducing risk and maximizing returns by not concentrating in any single area.
What type of investor this portfolio is suitable for
Speculative Investors
An investor aligned with this kind of setup is typically comfortable with substantial risk and volatility in pursuit of high long‑term growth. A long time horizon—often 10 years or more—helps, because short‑term swings can be large and unpredictable. This personality tends to accept that individual positions might be quite bumpy, as long as the overall strategy remains growth‑oriented and globally diversified at the core. Income needs are usually low, with more focus on capital appreciation than steady cash flows. Emotional resilience and the ability to stick with a plan through market drops are key traits for this style.
Positions
-
VT Vanguard Total World Stock Index Fund ETF Shares
VT - US9220427424 89.91% -
AM Advanced Micro Devices Inc
AMD - US0079031078 5.69% -
SP Fidelity® Government Money Market Fund
SPAXX - US31617H1023 2.17% -
WB Warner Bros Discovery Inc
WBD - US9344231041 1.92% -
MS AdvisorShares Pure US Cannabis ETF
MSOS - US00768Y4531 0.31%
The portfolio is overwhelmingly in one global stock ETF, with a small number of individual stocks and a tiny cash-like money market position. That creates a core-and-satellite structure: a diversified core plus a few high-conviction satellite picks. With roughly 98% in stocks, this setup fits a very growth-oriented approach and leaves little room for stability. Because the data covers only about seven months, it’s hard to judge how this mix holds up across full market cycles. As a general takeaway, such a heavy stock allocation can work best for long time horizons and for investors who can ride through large swings without changing course.
Growth
Over the short seven‑month window, a $1,000 starting value grew to about $1,077, yet the reported CAGR number is mathematically distorted by the limited data and compounding math. The portfolio’s return in this brief period is higher than both the U.S. and global benchmarks and shows a slightly smaller maximum drawdown, which looks strong but may just reflect favorable timing. One single day accounted for most of the gains, underlining how lumpy returns can be. Because past performance over such a short stretch is unreliable, it’s safer to treat this as “noise” rather than evidence of a persistent edge or a repeatable pattern.
Asset classes
- Stocks 98%
- No data 2%
Almost the entire portfolio sits in stocks, with a very small allocation to a money market fund and a minor slice categorized as “no data.” That means long‑term growth potential is high, but there’s minimal built‑in ballast for market downturns. Compared with more balanced mixes that include bonds or other stabilizers, this structure will typically swing more sharply up and down. With only seven months of history, the relatively modest maximum drawdown so far should not be assumed representative. A general principle: if short‑term volatility would be emotionally or financially painful, dialing in more defensive asset classes can sometimes create a smoother ride.
Sectors
- Technology 28%
- Financials 15%
- Industrials 11%
- Telecommunications 9%
- Consumer Discretionary 9%
- Health Care 8%
- Consumer Staples 5%
- Basic Materials 4%
- Energy 4%
- Utilities 2%
- Real Estate 2%
Sector exposure is spread across many areas, but technology stands out as the largest slice, with meaningful allocations to financials, industrials, telecoms, and consumer-related sectors. This broad spread is a positive sign and aligns reasonably well with global equity benchmarks, which is a strong indicator of diversification. However, a sizable tech tilt can still increase sensitivity to interest rates, innovation cycles, and regulatory news. During times when growth and tech stocks fall out of favor, such portfolios may experience sharper drops. Keeping the overall balance broadly in line with global norms, as seen here, supports resilience across different economic environments.
Regions
- North America 64%
- Europe Developed 13%
- Japan 6%
- Asia Developed 5%
- Asia Emerging 5%
- Australasia 2%
- Africa/Middle East 1%
- Latin America 1%
Geographically, the portfolio leans mainly toward North America, with solid representation from developed Europe and meaningful but smaller slices in Japan, other developed Asia, and emerging regions. That pattern is broadly in line with global equity benchmarks, which is a healthy sign and suggests the portfolio is not overly dependent on any single country’s fortunes. Having exposure across multiple regions can help when one local economy slows while others grow. Still, with only seven months of data, the apparent resilience so far shouldn’t be viewed as proof that this mix will always smooth out regional shocks; it just increases the odds of balance over time.
Market capitalization
- Mega-cap 45%
- Large-cap 30%
- Mid-cap 16%
- Small-cap 5%
- Micro-cap 1%
By market capitalization, the portfolio is anchored in mega‑cap and large‑cap companies, with smaller allocations to mid, small, and micro‑caps. This structure mirrors broad global equity markets, which is beneficial because larger firms usually have more stable earnings, deeper liquidity, and more analyst coverage. The measured exposure to smaller companies adds some extra growth potential and diversification without dominating risk. Over longer periods, this blend often provides a good balance between stability and upside. With only a short lookback, the behavior of smaller caps hasn’t really been tested here, but the current weighting keeps them from driving overall volatility.
True holdings
-
-
NV NVIDIA Corporation 3.37%
Part of fund(s):- Vanguard Total World Stock Index Fund ETF Shares
-
AA Apple Inc 3.13%
Part of fund(s):- Vanguard Total World Stock Index Fund ETF Shares
-
MS Microsoft Corporation 2.36%
Part of fund(s):- Vanguard Total World Stock Index Fund ETF Shares
-
-
AM Amazon.com Inc 1.64%
Part of fund(s):- Vanguard Total World Stock Index Fund ETF Shares
-
GO Alphabet Inc Class A 1.47%
Part of fund(s):- Vanguard Total World Stock Index Fund ETF Shares
-
23 Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. Ltd. 1.23%
Part of fund(s):- Vanguard Total World Stock Index Fund ETF Shares
-
AV Broadcom Inc 1.20%
Part of fund(s):- Vanguard Total World Stock Index Fund ETF Shares
-
GO Alphabet Inc Class C 1.20%
Part of fund(s):- Vanguard Total World Stock Index Fund ETF Shares
- Top 10 total 23.21%
Looking through the ETF, the top exposures lean heavily toward large, well‑known growth names, especially in technology and communication-related businesses. There is notable exposure to companies like NVIDIA, Apple, Microsoft, Amazon, Alphabet, and Taiwan Semiconductor via the ETF, plus a direct overweight to Advanced Micro Devices and Warner Bros Discovery. Overlap is certainly higher than shown here, since only ETF top‑10 holdings are captured, so hidden concentration in these big growth names is likely. This kind of overlap means the portfolio may be more sensitive to news and sentiment around a small group of mega companies than the headline number of holdings suggests.
Factors
Factor exposures are estimated using statistical models based on historical data and measure systematic (market-relative) tilts, not absolute portfolio characteristics. Results may vary depending on the analysis period, data availability, and currency of the underlying assets.
Factor exposure shows a very strong tilt toward momentum, meaning the holdings skew heavily toward stocks that have recently performed well. There’s a mild tilt away from value, so cheaper stocks based on fundamentals are underrepresented. Factor investing views these traits—momentum, value, size, and others—as underlying “drivers” of returns. A strong momentum tilt can boost returns when trends keep going, but it also tends to hurt when leadership flips suddenly, because you’re concentrated in what just worked. Given the short history, it’s no surprise recent winners dominate, but it’s worth recognizing that such a style can lead to sharp reversals at turning points.
Risk contribution
-
Vanguard Total World Stock Index Fund ETF Shares
Weight: 89.91% 70.0% -
Warner Bros Discovery Inc
Weight: 1.92% 20.5% -
Advanced Micro Devices Inc
Weight: 5.69% 9.6% -
Fidelity® Government Money Market Fund
Weight: 2.17% 0.3% -
AdvisorShares Pure US Cannabis ETF
Weight: 0.31% 0.0%
Risk contribution, which measures how much each holding adds to overall ups and downs, is highly concentrated. The global ETF drives about 70% of risk, which is roughly in line with its weight, but Warner Bros Discovery is only about 2% of the portfolio while contributing over 20% of total risk—a huge mismatch. AMD also adds more risk than its weight would suggest. When a tiny position carries a disproportionately large share of volatility, it can dominate the emotional experience of owning the portfolio. Adjusting position sizes so that risk lines up more closely with conviction can create a more intentional risk profile.
Redundant positions
-
High correlationFidelity® Government Money Market FundWarner Bros Discovery Inc
Correlation measures how closely different investments move together, where 1.0 means they move almost identically. Here, Warner Bros Discovery and the money market fund show a perfect correlation reading, which is likely just an artifact of the very short data period and unusual recent price behavior rather than a true relationship. Normally, a money market fund should behave very differently from a volatile stock. With only about seven months of prices, these correlation statistics should be taken with a big grain of salt. Longer histories are usually needed before drawing conclusions about which holdings truly diversify one another.
Risk vs. return
This chart shows the Efficient Frontier, calculated using your current assets with different allocation combinations. It highlights the best balance between risk and return based on historical data. "Efficient" portfolios maximize returns for a given risk or minimize risk for a given return. Portfolios below the curve are less efficient. This is informational and not a recommendation to buy or sell any assets.
Click on the colored dots to explore allocations.
The risk–return chart shows the current portfolio sitting well below the efficient frontier, which is the curve of the best possible return for each risk level using the existing holdings in different weights. The current Sharpe ratio—a measure of return per unit of risk—is solid but far lower than that of the optimal mix. This suggests that simply reweighting the same holdings could improve the risk/return tradeoff without adding anything new. However, because the inputs are based on only seven months of unusual performance, these optimization results are highly unstable, so any changes should be considered cautiously rather than followed mechanically.
Dividends
- Vanguard Total World Stock Index Fund ETF Shares 1.80%
- Fidelity® Government Money Market Fund 1.80%
- Weighted yield (per year) 1.66%
The overall dividend yield sits around 1.66%, with both the global ETF and money market fund yielding about 1.80%. That puts income in the modest range, typical of growth‑tilted global equity allocations. Dividends here act more as a bonus than a central feature; most of the expected return is coming from price changes, not payouts. For investors focused on compounding, automatically reinvesting these dividends can quietly add to long‑term growth. Because the history is short and interest rate conditions may change, current yields should be viewed as a snapshot, not a guarantee of what future income levels will look like.
Ongoing product costs
- AdvisorShares Pure US Cannabis ETF 0.83%
- Vanguard Total World Stock Index Fund ETF Shares 0.07%
- Weighted costs total (per year) 0.07%
Costs are impressively low overall. The core global ETF’s expense ratio is just 0.07%, which is extremely competitive and supports better long‑term performance by letting more market return flow through to the investor. The small cannabis ETF position carries a much higher fee, but its tiny weight means it barely moves the portfolio’s total cost. Low fees are one of the few things investors can reliably control, unlike market returns. Keeping this expense structure lean is a real strength and fully aligned with best practices for long‑term investing, especially when using a broadly diversified index fund as the main building block.
What next?
Ready to invest in this portfolio?
Select a broker that fits your needs and watch for low fees to maximize your returns.
Create your own report?
Join our community!
The information provided on this platform is for informational purposes only and should not be considered as financial or investment advice. Insightfolio does not provide investment advice, personalized recommendations, or guidance regarding the purchase, holding, or sale of financial assets. The tools and content are intended for educational purposes only and are not tailored to individual circumstances, financial needs, or objectives.
Insightfolio assumes no liability for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Users are solely responsible for verifying the information and making independent decisions based on their own research and careful consideration. Use of the platform should not replace consultation with qualified financial professionals.
Investments involve risks. Users should be aware that the value of investments may fluctuate and that past performance is not an indicator of future results. Investment decisions should be based on personal financial goals, risk tolerance, and independent evaluation of relevant information.
Insightfolio does not endorse or guarantee the suitability of any particular financial product, security, or strategy. Any projections, forecasts, or hypothetical scenarios presented on the platform are for illustrative purposes only and are not guarantees of future outcomes.
By accessing the services, information, or content offered by Insightfolio, users acknowledge and agree to these terms of the disclaimer. If you do not agree to these terms, please do not use our platform.
Instrument logos provided by Elbstream.
Help us improve Insightfolio
Your feedback makes a difference! Share your thoughts in our quick survey. Take the survey